I love this emotionally charged terminology, "an outmoded push-pull notion of causality,", like you would have to be some kind of half-wit to believe in something so primitive!

Yes, I have heard of action at a distance. But gravitation is a physical force detectable by scientific instruments, which is described mathematically as a field eminating from the gravitating object (or a warp in space-time in the Einsteinian view) and the objects on which that gravitational field acts come into direct causal contact with that field (or physically pass through that warped portion of space-time) so there is no magic involved in action at a distance, just the ordinary kind of "push-pull" causality familiar to science.

The kind of projection that Velmans advocates on the other hand is a magical mystical entity that is supposedly located in external space, and yet it is undetectable by any means known to science in the space outside the head where those experiences are supposedly located. As I now point out in the new Section 2.3, this kind of hypothesis is not really a physical or scientific hypothesis, but is actually a kind of spiritual entity to be believed in (by those who are so inclined), rather than anything knowable by, or demonstrable to science.

So all of the so-called "non-sequiturs" of which this reviewer complains are merely paradigmatic hypotheses that clash with his own favored paradigmatic assumptions.